Not sure how much effort you want to go to, but if you want to have it both ways you could have a per-request object which has composed into it the session-scope object.
Did you do that dump of the variables scope? I'd be interested to see how CFGRID is doing this. I'd have a look myself, but my copy of CF8 is still in a box on my desk. Jaime Metcher > -----Original Message----- > From: Charles Sheehan-Miles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, 11 September 2007 7:14 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Odd behavior when using cfform inside a CFC > > > Well, the verdict here: > > 1) If I create the object every request, the javascript appears and > the cfform works fine > 2) If I CFINCLUDE a CFM template, the javascript appears and the > cffform works fine > 3) If it is invoked from a persistent object (in either application > or session scope) it shows up the first time I access the page, but > subsequent access fails to send the page with the needed javascript > > Hmm. I want the cfgrid considerably less than I want to do either of > the first two, because both of the first two options introduce the > problems I was trying to avoid by having the thing in memory in the > first place. Ah, well. > > ---------------------------------- > Charles Sheehan-Miles | http://www.sheehanmiles.com > Author of Republic: A Novel of America's Future > > ....Sparse, clean narrative... Pay attention to this new book... -- > Pulitzer > Prize winning journalist John Hanchette, Niagara Falls Reporter > > This novel ...may be prophetic...It will disturb you...It should. -- > DailyKos > > > > > On Sep 10, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Brian Kotek wrote: > > > You could try dumping the variables scope of the CFC to see if > > cfform is > > putting something in there. But whatever the problem is, I'm pretty > > sure it > > must be related to the fact that the CFC is being stored in a > > shared scope. > > Does switching to a per-request CFC allow the JavaScript to work > > correctly? > > While I don't recommend doing it in general, you might also see if > > doing a > > cfinclude of a template that contains the cfform tags makes a > > difference. > > > > On 9/10/07, Jaime Metcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> Well, this really is just a wild guess, but maybe it's worth trying > >> re-instantiating the CFC on every request. CFFORM could be > >> stashing some > >> state in that CFC. > >> > >> Jaime Metcher > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Charles Sheehan-Miles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> Sent: Monday, 10 September 2007 6:58 PM > >>> To: CF-Talk > >>> Subject: Re: Odd behavior when using cfform inside a CFC > >>> > >>> > >>> Jaime .... interesting question, and yes, the CFC in this case is > >>> stored in the session scope. > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Get involved in the latest ColdFusion discussions, product development sharing, and articles on the Adobe Labs wiki. http://labs/adobe.com/wiki/index.php/ColdFusion_8 Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:288207 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
