I would assume the specific issues would be the crux of the matter. Without them, it is difficult to speculate.
In regards to performance, the scopes you mention are often used to increase performance in well designed applications. If the server doesn't have enough resources to accommodate their use, then yes, performance will suffer, but the primary reason is a lack of server resources, not the use of application, session and client scopes. On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:39 AM, Byron Mann <byronos...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Trying to wrap my head around any implications around not using an > application file. > > Our admins are telling me that we run into issues with customers on our > shared platform not having one. (they didn't specify the issues in the > email). > > I can see how non-unique application names might be an issue, but I'm > failing to see any pitfalls to not having one. If anything I would say it > would improve performance, since you could not use application, session and > client scope, thus using less memory utilization. > > Looking for any experience where this may have been an issue before I talk > to them tomorrow. > > Byron Mann > Lead Engineer & Architect > HostMySite.com > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:356834 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
