Even though I haven't tried it simply because I've found no hugely
compelling reason to upgrade, I've heard nothing bad about it. It's the
same engine (slightly tweaked) as SQL Server 7 so I can't forsee much
happening.
-----Original Message-----
From: Adrian Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 2:56 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: SQL Server 2000
----- Original Message -----
From: "Derek Hamilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 10:23 PM
>
> I am in the process of planning my upgrade to SQL Server 2000 from SQL
Server
7.0. I was >wondering if anyone has noticed anything odd or difficult in
respect to ColdFusion (4.5 and
No - it was totally seamless for me. The databases are automatically
upgraded,
and the existing DSN's work fine.
Adrian Cooper.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
