Oh ya..and BTW...I agree with Zac....Fusebox may have some good concepts, but it just doesn't work in all cases and can certainly cause unwanted complexity
my 2 cents Bryan Stevenson VP & Director of E-Commerce Development Electric Edge Systems Group Inc. p. 250.920.8830 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------- Allaire Alliance Partner www.allaire.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bryan Stevenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 12:12 PM Subject: Re: Fusebox - opinions? > Go Zac! Canada! Canada! Canada! ;-) > > Hey Zac remember ServisNet :-) > > Bryan Stevenson > VP & Director of E-Commerce Development > Electric Edge Systems Group Inc. > p. 250.920.8830 > e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------- > Allaire Alliance Partner > www.allaire.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Zac Belado" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 12:06 PM > Subject: RE: Fusebox - opinions? > > > > > If you are > > > looking to try and instill good disciplines and readability in your code > > > Fusebox is also good for that. > > > > This presumes that the developers know fusebox. > > > > You could also get this same benefit from documenting your methods and > > making sure your developers follow a single standard. > > > > Fusebox doesn't bring anything to development (in these terms) that any > > other documented methodology would. > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
