hstk30-hw wrote:

I guess the `i8` is from 
https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/blob/2a70c42d62e9c3eb5887fa50b71257f20daca6f9/cppabi64/cppabi64.rst#41summary-of-differences-from-and-additions-to-the-generic-c-abi

> The GC++ABI defines the way in which empty class types are laid out. For the 
> purposes of parameter passing in 
> [[AAPCS64](https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/releases)], a parameter 
> whose type is an empty class shall be treated as if its type were an 
> aggregate with a single member of type unsigned byte.

and in 
[gcppabi](https://itanium-cxx-abi.github.io/cxx-abi/abi.html#empty-parameters)

> Arguments of empty class types that are not non-trivial for the purposes of 
> calls are passed no differently from ordinary classes.

I guess I should fix in `va_arg` instead of `classifyArgumentType`, right? 
@rjmccall 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72197
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to