================
@@ -198,15 +213,31 @@ RValue
CodeGenFunction::EmitAMDGPUDevicePrintfCallExpr(const CallExpr *E) {
}
llvm::Value *Arg = A.getRValue(*this).getScalarVal();
+ if (isString(A.getType().getTypePtr()) && CGM.getLangOpts().OpenCL)
+ Arg = Builder.CreateAddrSpaceCast(Arg, CGM.Int8PtrTy);
Args.push_back(Arg);
}
- llvm::IRBuilder<> IRB(Builder.GetInsertBlock(), Builder.GetInsertPoint());
- IRB.SetCurrentDebugLocation(Builder.getCurrentDebugLocation());
+ auto PFK = CGM.getTarget().getTargetOpts().AMDGPUPrintfKindVal;
+ bool isBuffered =
+ (PFK == clang::TargetOptions::AMDGPUPrintfKind::Buffered);
+
+ StringRef FmtStr;
+ if (llvm::getConstantStringInfo(Args[0], FmtStr)) {
+ if (FmtStr.empty())
+ FmtStr = StringRef("", 1);
+ } else {
+ if (CGM.getLangOpts().OpenCL) {
----------------
ssahasra wrote:
This looks like the wrong place for a diagnostic. For an OpenCL program,
shouldn't Sema have already verified that the arguments match the required
types, such as "constant address space" for the format string?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72556
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
