Luís Oliveira <luis...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Nicolas Martyanoff <khae...@gmail.com> wrote: >> If the people which manage the git repository don't have the time (for >> the last 10 months…) to apply a trivial patch (1 minute top), would they >> consider giving a commit bit to people that can ? > > Applying the patch is indeed trivial. Verifying that it works > correctly is not as trivial. Adding the missing documentation bits to > the User Manual takes a little bit of extra time too. > > Anyway, maintenance help is of course most welcome. In that regard, > the one thing that cffi-grovel is currently missing the most is a test > suite. If you're inclined to work on that, that'd be great. I'd start > with a bitfield test case.
In that case, please just say clearly on launchpad "we won't include it because there's no doc and/or no test case" :) If the official answer is simply "we don't want it", I'll just fork the git repository. The issue was the absence of feedback, nothing more. Regards, -- Nicolas Martyanoff http://codemore.org khae...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ cffi-devel mailing list cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel