On 2003-10-19, Christopher Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Oct 2003, Mark Stosberg wrote:
>> I think I find the "mix-in" method the most intuitive way to handle
>> plug-in methods generically.
>
> The DBI/DBD model for plug-ins is much more intuitive from the module user
> perspective, but it does take a lot of work to pull off something that
> elegant. Any volunteers? :)
You mean how there are lots of "DBD::*" modules which talk to different
backends? That seems like a different case to me, since the the DBD::*
modules are mostly trying to implement the same interface. With
CGI::App plug-ins, I would imagine that each one would mostly be
defining it's own interface for unique functionality.
If you are referring to something else, could you elaborate?
Thanks,
Mark
--
http://mark.stosberg.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
