Michael Peters wrote:
No big surprises, but perhaps interesting to take a look
Another surprise for me is that Titanium has a startup time of .14s where C::A has .21s. Isn't Titanium just C::A under the hood? How can it be faster?
Also you don't mention how many times you ran each benchmark and whether you averaged those times. It's possible that OS caching of files, etc could help Titanium startup faster if it was 2nd and both were run only once.
-- Michael Peters Plus Three, LP ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################
