From: Christian Kellermann <ck...@pestilenz.org> Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] string->number shouldn't raise errors but return #f on failure Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 19:22:31 +0100
> Hi Peter, > > I have pushed your patch and dropped the C_i_ prefix from the > internal helper procedure as discussed on #chicken. > >> PS: shouldn't C_i_finitep actually be called C_u_i_finitep? >> It's obviously unsafe (pass it any non-fixnum immediate and it'll >> probably blow up). > > I think so too, this definitely belongs to another patch. Other > opinions? Changing this name will create problems with older chickens that rewrite "finite?" to C_i_finitep, so this should be better avoided. cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
