* Peter Bex <peter....@xs4all.nl> [140213 21:28]: > Hi all, > > I think I finally figured out the problem of #877; because it's sending > alternate signals from threads, some signals were probably arriving > while the child process' handler was adding another signal to the queue. > This would in turn cause the position in the queue to get corrupted. > > At least, I think that's what was happening... Concurrency makes my > brain hurt. I ran a few tests and I can't trigger the signal-test error > anymore. But that was also the case with my previous patch, so it could > be dumb "luck". Let's push it and see if Salmonella starts complaining. > It would also be great if everyone tests it on their multi-CPU boxes.
Makes sense to me, I have pushed it. Thank you! -- In the world, there is nothing more submissive and weak than water. Yet for attacking that which is hard and strong, nothing can surpass it. --- Lao Tzu _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
