[From the right address this time] There is a pak file for each language, so you'd have in include all language pak files in the binary, and only one would be used at any given time, so there would be some overhead as far a memory, etc.
TVL On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Satoru Takabayashi <sato...@chromium.org>wrote: > The chrome binary for Linux seems to load resource bundles from a file > named "chrome.pak", while the resource booundles are embedded in the chrome > DLL in other platforms (correct me if I'm wrong). This makes me wonder if > it's a good idea to embed chrome.pak in the chrome binary for Linux. This > would save open+mmap cost (probably negligible though), and would make the > package a bit simpler. I guess it can be done with objcopy, without too > much work. Any thoughts? > > Satoru > > -- > Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com > View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: > http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -- Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
