http://www.youtube.com/user/zeropointinstitute Tong and Tseung crude, primitive magnetic generator according to Bedini methods.
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Wang_Shum_Ho_Generator --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, "muckblit" <muckb...@...> wrote: > > I guess war with China and notion of a diff between Brzezhinksy Trilats > and neocons might be the biggest ideas. Afghanistan is partly about > liberating the poppies in 2001 to raise production from low 100's > to 4000 tons a year of opium, then to block the Iran to China and > the Pakistan to China pipelines for Iranian oil/gas. > > Neocons are crazy enough to bomb Iran via US or Israel. Russia and > Iran have common interests in Caspian oil and somehow managing > the addiction of their people to opium while profits go around them > through the al-CIA-duh corridors which base terrorism against Iran > and separatism against Russian periphery essential to pipelines to > Germany and Europe. > > Then there is the timing. If the US economic collapse accelerates > then bombing Iran might seem like a good distraction to restore > public confidence in the international looters. > > The Chinese are about to market a 5kw magnetic generator. We > made a Hamel spinning disc from speaker magnets and then the > Leedskalnin magnet motors are very sophisticated. Merely > emulsifying fuel and water using ultrasound removes NOx > from diesel emissions while greatly increasing efficiency. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs/message/49627 > http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Magnet_Motors > http://www.thequantumkey.com/members_only.html > http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Wang_Shum_Ho_Generator > > > The US hegemonic coup state is the British empire extended. > al-CIA-duh and BP oil spill are modern day versions of the > Venetian bankers hiring the asian hordes to steal gold and > then Barbary pirates having English and Dutch captains. > Centralization of all things, including energy and dope and > currency and credit, depends on centralizing information > flow. That is so plain in some of their documents and symbols. > > -Bob > > --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, "Vigilius Haufniensis" > thehatefulnerd@ wrote: > > > > What say'st thee, Bob? > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs/message/49740 > > > > > > > > http://fcreview.blogspot.com/2010/08/iran-situation-and-ww3.html > > > > Sunday, August 22, 2010 > > Iran Situation and WW3 > > Ok, there is alot of talk about a war with Iran right now. I think > these concerns are legit. World War 3 (with China) has been scheduled > for 2015 for over 20 years now. Due to economic factors, this agenda > might be ramped up a bit. This will start with Iran, a major source of > Chinese petroleum and spread from there. The whole idea of the > Afghanistan conflict is to block the Chinese from putting oil pipelines > through the region. That's the big factor, the opium production and vast > untapped mineral wealth are important too, but secondarily so. > > Remember the Bosnian conflict of the 90s? Well that enabled the US to > set up the Kosovo Liberation Army, the KLA. This was a forward base of > operations supporting the Chenya conflict, aimed against Russia. (Yes, > oil producing region.) The KLA are a mafia that funnels Afghan opium, > transported by the Kurds, into Europe. The proceeds fund CIA black > operations worldwide and may also be funneled through the Cayman Islands > and other offshore locations to support Wall Street when necessary. When > Jimmy Carter got into office, he appointed Stansfield Turner to direct > the CIA. His job was to throw out Poppy Bush and "The Boys." So they uh, > "privatized." The KLA traffic narcotics, weapons, women, children and > terror. But they seem to specialize in Eastern European women and > children. Along with Dyncorp. > > This was serious business to Russia, as they view this region as part > of their cultural sphere of influence. World War 3 almost broke out in > '00 with the sinking of the Kursk. The Russians didn't like that at all. > When the US went to war with Iraq 3 years later, thousands of Russian > troops volunteered to fight in Iraq. Against us. What few weapons the > Iraqi resistance did not obtain through Poppy Bush and Hillary Clinton's > American LaFarge group, they got from Russia. Didn't you know the > Clintons work for the Bushes? Ha ha ha. The Bushes work for the > Harrimans. The Harrimans work for the Rockefellers. > > When Bernanke talks about "dropping money from helicopters" to prevent > deflation, what he really means is funneling money into the economy > through establishment supported (and protected) organized criminal > activity. (This activity is hardly limited to Kosovo. It goes back to > WW2. And even farther to the Opium Wars. But I digress.) > > As to Tarpley's analysis of US dollar hegemony, I must say I concur. > You can see in my archives how I was tracking the fall of the Euro. (The > trend is your friend, until it ends, because then, it bends!) Well, I > had a total hardware crash and haven't recovered yet, so I haven't been > following it lately, but I guess it's looking like the trend may be > over. I still think the Anglo-Americans will win, though. LOL. > > Here's one thing Tarpley doesn't bring up. Yeah, the Anglo-Americans > want to maintain US Petrodollar hegemony. But I don't think they > necessarily want to create demand for US dollars by increasing the price > of oil. If they could get more for oil, they'd love that, but the price > of oil (and gold) is an indicator of inflation. They want their currency > to SEEM like it is worth more than it really is, so they can get more > for it, even though they print it out of nothing. The whole point of the > Militarization of the US (and the war on Iraq) is that we want to use > our military to force other countries to take our losses for us. Saddam > started selling oil in Euros. Bad, bad Saddam! > > Here's the real issue, as far as I'm concerned. This is called > "Petrodollar recycling." Imagine you go to the store and you buy > whatever you want. You write a check out to pay for it. Now instead of > cashing that check, the store LENDS THE MONEY BACK TO YOU. Pretty good > system, isn't it? Well, now imagine it's 40 years later, and they wanna > start CASHING ALL THOSE CHECKS. Well, the Saudis have been taking all > the money we spend on oil and investing it back into US dollar > denominated assets. That's part of a secret agreement Kissinger made > with them in the 70s. They even got their own plates to print out US > dollar paper money. But if you hold trillions of dollars, and the dollar > keeps being worth less and less, you're losing alot of wealth. > > Here's what's going to happen. Israel will attack Iran. Sooner or > later. Obama is against it. He's doing what he can, but he only has so > much power. Brzezinski is his boss. > > Brzezinski has been busy promoting "Color Revolutions" throughout > Eastern Europe that past five years or so. George Soros and the National > Endowment for Democracy are his boys. Anyway, the goal is to encircle > China geopolitically. With military bases and shit. > > Well Brzezinski's big thing is proxy war. Originally he wanted to use > diplomacy to get Iran on our side. (I use the term "our" rather loosely. > LOL. It refers to the Anglo-American Global Dominance Group.) Anyway, > his original plan was to use Iran to attack Russia. He's crazy. He grew > up in Poland during WW2 and has alot of crazy bitterness towards Russia. > He's an old line cold warrior. His bloodline has a perverse > multi-century aristocratic feud with Russia. He also bears a striking > resemblance to The Abominable Dr. Phibes. But once again I digress. > > The NeoCons are too powerful for Brzezinski's Trilateralist faction. I > think this is some sort of compromise. Amadinejad himself works for the > NeoCons, imo. That's another factor, as do Merkel and Sarkozy. So it's > looking like Iran is "back on the table." It will start between Israel > and Iran, but it won't end there. China will move against Taiwan. That's > the fuse that will ignite a new World War. (Russia and China will enter > an "Axis of Evil" with Iran. They won't be for us, they'll be against > us!) > > It's just a grand geopolitical experiment, really. The US is right > where Britain was 100 years ago. But the British military had been badly > depleted in the Boer War. The US, like Britain then, is the unchallenged > widely acknowledged yet declining superpower. China is in the position > the US was 100 years ago. A vast untapped workforce on the brink of > rising to world hegemony. But there is one difference. The US still has > unchallenged military supremacy. The British had to draw the US into > wars with Germany in order to win, twice. So it's a grant experiment. > Will military supremacy be enough to maintain global domination? We'll > see! It will be a lesson for all of history. Interesting times! > > Here's what will happen if the US wins World War 3. The US will seize > gold and mineral wealth from China, repudiate all foreign debt and > impose war reparations not unlike those that were imposed upon Germany > after WW1. The US will continue to use it's military power to force > other nations to take their losses for them. They will continue to take > losses not because of poor economic policy, but because of continued > siphoning of wealth by the oligarchs. The entire planet will be > enslaved! > > If China wins, they will do the same thing, only instead of the > Rockefellers being the oligarchs, it will be the Soong and the Li > families. LOL. > > >
