THE CONTROLLED COLLAPSE OF WTC 7

        

"Hey, World Trade 7 fell down like because, because, because, um, the mayor stored thousands of gallons of diesel fuel in an office building. Yeah, that's it. Diesel fuel. It's just a coincidence that every single load bearing member on the ground floor failed at the exact same moment in time. Coincidence. CO-IN-SEE-DUNCE! Trust us. We're the government."

9/11 Videos:
THE CONTROLLED COLLAPSE OF WTC 7

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc7.html



WMV video of the above collapse (490kB)

Full sized slo-mo GIF of above (352KB)

Take a close look at the manner in which WTC 7 collapses straight down. For the building to collapse in this fashion, all of the load bearing supports would have had to fail at exactly the same time.

The claim that the collapse was the result of a fire requires the fire be equally distributed throughout the entire floor of the building, providing equal heat for an equal amount of time, so that all the load bearings members would fail at the exact same moment.
Do you find this plausible?

MPEG video of above (1.3MB)     


“Amazing, incredible pick your word. For the third time today, it’s reminiscent of those pictures we’ve all seen too much on television before, where a building was deliberately destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down.”


CBS News anchor Dan Rather commenting on the collapse of Building 7 - September 11, 2001 at approx 5:30pm EST.


The stability of the above video indicates the camera is directly connected to the ground via a tripod. The video enlargement on the right reveals a camera wobble when part of WTC 7's roof collapses, the camera then steadies, and roughly 4 seconds later the building comes down.

An explosive detonation in the basement of WTC 7 would cause a ground shake, and this would explain the camera wobble seen during the rooftop collapse. A ground shake also preceded the collapse of WTC 1.

WMV video of above (213kB)

RealMedia video showing evidence of cutter charges in WTC 7's collapse


680KB - to download video right click link and select 'Save Target As'




Note the highlighted smoke coming from the upper floors
(Click thumbnails for larger images)

Other media coverage of the collapse...


WMV video of above (194kB)      
WMV video of above (387kB)      
WMV video of above (296kB)

WMV video of above (442kB)

If WTC 7 spontaneously collapsed then how did so many people catch its demise?
WTC 7 collapsed in roughly 7 seconds - that's freefall.

Are we to believe that diesel fires miraculously transformed the building's support columns from steel into jelly at 5:20 p.m. on 9/11? That's the only way WTC 7 could have collapsed into its footprint at this speed without explosives.


        
Click to download a video showing the controlled demolition of the building on the left (1.2MB MOV)

[Source: Controlled Demolition]

Note how the building collapses in exactly the same way as WTC 7.
[How Building Implosions Work]

Click to download a video showing the building on the right collapsing without explosives (149kB WMV)

This is how WTC 7 should have collapsed...


MORE TOPPLED BUILDINGS

The photos below are of buildings which collapsed during an earthquake. They show the typical result that occurs when a single load bearing member fails, resulting in the remains of the building tipping over and down onto the initiating point.







For a building to collapse into its own footprint, as WTC 7 did, ALL the load bearing members must fail at the exact same moment. This is achieved in controlled demolitions.


Larry Silverstein, the controller of the destroyed WTC complex, stated in a PBS documentary that he and the FDNY decided jointly to demolish WTC 7 late in the afternoon of September 11, 2001.


The above demonstrates that WTC 7 was indeed demolished, so why did FEMA spend many hoursdreaming up a report which claims the building collapsed through fire?

See also: The 9/11 WTC Collapses: An Audio-Video Analysis



  What Really Happened



Click to join catapultthepropaganda

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/catapultthepropaganda/join



Reply via email to