Rodney, I understand there is already some l4 hashing in the etherchannel side of the house ? So the feature you mention would add L4 hashing into what specific platforms ? I assume it would be hardware dependent of course, but just wondering :-)..
Rodney Dunn wrote: > 144_(config-if)#ip load-sharing ? > per-destination Deterministic distribution > per-packet Random distribution > > CEF default isn't per destination it's a per src/dst hash. > > We've added the ability to hash on L4 ports too it's just > not shipping yet. > > Rodney > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 03:28:10PM -0400, Paul Stewart wrote: >> Hi there.. >> >> We have a number of sites that are layer3 load balanced using OSPF or static >> routing... >> >> For example: >> >> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.10.10.1 >> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.10.10.2 >> >> This doesn't provide for an equal bandwidth allocation although it works >> reasonable well... with some of these connections now I'm looking for >> something that does "per packet" load balancing as some of these connections >> have one soure and one destination therefore the "per destination" doesn't >> work well.... >> >> What's the best route to take? (pardon the pun) >> >> Paul >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/