That's good news. That's what we heard as well. Since we are doing box-to-box redudancy (eigrp load balancing) and not using SSO, RPR/RPR+ then there shouldn't be an issue.
---- Matthew Huff | One Manhattanville Rd OTA Management LLC | Purchase, NY 10577 http://www.ox.com | Phone: 914-460-4039 aim: matthewbhuff | Fax: 914-460-4139 > -----Original Message----- > From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp- > boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Michel Renfer > Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 10:58 AM > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] sup 720 3c 10GE blades for 7600 > > AFAIK there are some issues when using the the RSP720-10G in redundant > configurations. Thats the statement we know, why the RSP is not yet > general orderable. > > cheers, > michel > > -----Original Message----- > From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp- > boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Matthew Huff > Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 4:00 PM > To: 'Cisco Nsp' > Subject: [c-nsp] sup 720 3c 10GE blades for 7600 > > Our cisco rep and var are pushing back on our plans to upgrade our 7600 > from > sup32 to the RSP 720 with 10GE saying they are in limited production. > Of > course, they are pushing us toward the ASR product line. Anyone know of > any > issues with the RSP 720 w 10GE interfaces? > > ---- > Matthew Huff | One Manhattanville Rd > OTA Management LLC | Purchase, NY 10577 > http://www.ox.com | Phone: 914-460-4039 > aim: matthewbhuff | Fax: 914-460-4139 > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
