One thing to be aware of is that currently the ASA doesn't support setting the managed or other flag for the RA for ipv6 for DHCPv6 support. This is supposed to be fixed in the next release for the ASA real soon now (tm).
> -----Original Message----- > From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net > [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On > Behalf Of Johnson, Neil M > Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 5:49 PM > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [c-nsp] ASA vs. ASR for large Wireless NAT deployment ? > > > We have a large campus wireless (~8-10K clients simultaneously) network > that we are considering moving to private address space and NAT'ing to the > outside world. > > I'm looking at the ASA 5585 with SSP20 or an ASA 1004 with an ESP20 and > RP2. > > One requirement is that the NAT device not mangle IPv6 and only NAT IPv4 > traffic destined to the Internet (we route some private address space > internally). > > Any recommendations ? > > Thanks. > -Neil > > -- > Neil Johnson > Network Engineer > The University of Iowa > Phone: 319 384-0938 > Fax: 319 335-2951 > Mobile: 319 540-2081 > E-Mail: neil-john...@uiowa.edu > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
