Hello.  What's the ios version (some defaults do not show in the config on
some versions)?  Also, if you do a show time is it accurate?  Also, if you
do a debug ntp packet does you router and time server exchange packets?  The
ntp clock period not showing may not be important.

Mitch
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Pichit Ruangroj" 
To: 
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 6:18 AM
Subject: ntp not sync with server [7:71887]


> Hi,
>     I've got a prob with ntp. The ntp is configured but the command "ntp
> clock-period ........." didn't appear when doing "show running" command.
> I've tried reload, disable/enable the ntp but never work. I saw the offset
> value is very high compare with the normal one. What is the cause to make
it
> high like this? Please help.
>
> pbi_vgw_003#sh run | be ntp
> ntp update-calendar
> ntp server 203.113.94.20
> ntp server 203.113.94.19
>
> pbi_vgw_003#sh ntp as
>
>       address                  ref clock     st  when  poll reach  delay
> offset    disp
>  ~203.113.94.20    203.113.94.1      2    57    64    0     1.1    2699.9
> 16000.
>  ~203.113.94.19    203.113.94.1      2    42    64    0     1.0    833.67
> 16000.
>  * master (synced), # master (unsynced), + selected, - candidate,
> ~configured
>
> The another device is on the same subnet & never get a problem
>
>
> pbi_vgw_001#sh run | be ntp
> ntp clock-period 17179504
> ntp update-calendar
> ntp server 203.113.94.20
> ntp server 203.113.94.19
>
> pbi_vgw_001#sh ntp as
>
>       address                 ref clock        st  when  poll reach  delay
> offset    disp
> *~203.113.94.20    203.113.94.1      2   281  1024  377     1.1    1.28
> 0.3
> +~203.113.94.19    203.113.94.1      2   259  1024  377     1.1    6.81
> 0.4
>  * master (synced), # master (unsynced), + selected, - candidate,
> ~configured




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71892&t=71887
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to