Why don't you elimated the software vpn clients and terminate a single vpn tunnel on the 806, perfromance will be alot better. The 806 should be fine in this scenario.
Chris ""Dain Deutschman"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi Everyone, > > VPN Question: I have a client with 16 small locations ( 2-8 nodes per > location ) that may want to access a Windows Terminal Server at a central > site in the future to run thier database app. Not all the locations have > broadband internet access...although they will within a year or two. The > speed of the broadband is on average around 400-500Kbps ( with the exception > of the dial-up ). > Will a Cisco 806 at the central site and a mix of software VPN clients and > 806 routers at the remote sites work? Or would an 806 not be able to keep up > on the performance side? Any suggestions? > > -- > Dain Deutschman > CNA, MCP, CCNA > Data Communications Manager Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49051&t=49034 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
