Andy Fiddaman wrote: > On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > ; On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 07:28 -0700, John Rudd wrote: > ; > (to the developers, not in answer to Burnie) > ; > > ; > See, the current name scheme needs to be fixed. And no one responded at > ; > all to my proposed scheme from a month or two ago. > ; > ; Coincidentally, my very first question on this list years ago was about > ; naming conventions (or the lack thereof), too. :) > > It's not just core Clam signatures either, SaneSecurity recently changed > the capitalisation on some of their sigs which caused me a few issues (I'm > checking case-insensitively now!) The same thing happened when > Phishing.Email changed to Phishing.Heuristics.Email on 29/6. > > Standardising prefixes would be excellent for those of us who make > decisions based on what's coming back.
Yup. Caused me an issue too. Suddenly I had an unexpected source of virus signatures in my metrics. I didn't appreciate that at all. _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
