Hi Pekka, Sat, 13 Oct 2012 10:22:52 +0300 от Pekka Enberg <penb...@kernel.org>: >Hi Ivan, > > (I'm also CC'ing Andrew.) > > Have you filled the FSF copyright assignment paperwork? I was looking > at your tree: Of course I signed it (in May 2010).
My mistake was to develop these fixes for 4 year with out contribution and then (in 2010) upgrade to the recent Classpath and push all at once (a big amount of code as you could see in that branch). The problem that at that time there remained only 1 (or 2) patch reviewers at Classpath. Andrew reviewed and accepted a couple of patches. The discussion stopped at processing fixes to StrictMath (Andrew requested StrictMath test, I wrote it and nothing more). Since pushing of these patches to github, I'm fine to have multiple Classpath "master" branches at different servers. I noticed some activity recently (e.g., moving from cvs to git) but again I see the narrow place - code reviewing. May be it's time to change the policy of patch acceptance from "please find a person who reviews (among 1 or 2 guys) your code" to "if signed FSF paper, and you have patches, post them to ML, commit to some feature development branch and, if no objections within 2-3 weeks, merge the branch to master, in case of further objections revert the patches". > >https://github.com/ivmai/classpath/commits/ivmai4review-v2 > > and was wondering if it's OK to try to push forward some of your bug fixes?yes, good luck, ask me if something is unclear. You could start with StrictMath fix. Regards, Ivan > > Pekka >
