----- Original Message -----
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> Wed, 17 Oct 2012 03:46:19 -0400 (EDT) от Andrew Hughes
> <gnu.and...@redhat.com>:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > Hi Andrew,
> > 
> > Sun, 14 Oct 2012 17:02:52 -0400 (EDT) от Andrew Hughes
> > < ahug...@redhat.com >:
> > > Because he actually wants them to be included in GNU Classpath.
> > 
> > On Tue, 16 Oct 2012, Ivan Maidanski wrote:
> > > Can't understand. There are GNU Classpath development branches?
> > 
> > I guess what Andrew is trying to say here is that I work against
> > GNU
> > Classpath master and submit changes for review and inclusion very
> > aggressively.
> > 
> > That pretty much avoids the problem you're having with a huge
> > backlog
> > of
> > unreviewed changes. ;-)
> > 
> 
> What am I saying is it's fine to develop on a branch, of course, but
> if you
> actually want the work included in a release, it has to be on
> trunk/HEAD/whatever.
> So, you recommend me to put the patches I've prepared to SVN
> trunk/HEAD? Are we still going to support SVN? (It seems I don't I
> understand your "it has to be on".)
> 

Classpath doesn't and never has used Subversion, so I'm confused by this 
comment.

>
> 
> If you're familiar with how Linux is developed, it's like fixing it
> in one of the
> subsystem trees, or linux-next, but never asking Linus to pull it
> into his tree
> for the next release.
> Heard of. Every vendor has its own patched Linux.
> But I don't understand why you are referring to? Activity at Linux
> git significantly differs from that of Classpath, pulling policy
> differs as well and I don't think you going to match.
> 

This is nothing to do with vendors.

We're still pretty new at using git for GNU Classpath.  There's no reason
we couldn't adopt a model of working in branches, then asking a maintainer
to pull into HEAD.

> Anyway, as you already noticed, the patches are at a branch on a
> github - anyone could checkout and cherry-pick.
> 

Sure. But that won't get them in a future release.

> Regards,
> Ivan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > Pekka
> 
> --
> Andrew :)
> 
> Free Java Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Inc. ( http://www.redhat.com )
> 
> PGP Key: 248BDC07 ( https://keys.indymedia.org/ )
> Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Andrew :)

Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F  8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07


Reply via email to