> * Handles interfaces correctly ... Give me some help here; When > you have a public interface do all the methods-fields default to > "public"? I always explicitly declare them "public", but that's not > the case in eg. java.net.SocketOptions (is that a valid > declaration?) (Thanks Michael)
I found this on the net: "Member declarations in an interface disallow the use of some declaration modifiers; you cannot use transient, volatile, or synchronized in a member declaration in an interface. Also, you may not use the private and protected specifiers when declaring members of an interface." http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/java/interpack/createinterface.html I think this implicitely means they are public. Michael -- Homepage: http://www.worldforge.org/ GPG-key: http://konqueror.dyndns.org/~mkoch/michael.gpg _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath