Hi, On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 00:54, Brian Jones wrote: > Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I would certainly made this into three commits but would have just used > > the given separate ChangeLog entries as shown since eacht entry is > > clearly a group of changes that is related. > > My typical usage is: > > 1) Make vast sweeping changes > 2) cd classpath > 3) cvs ci . > > I don't really like that this puts changes to other files in the log > of every file... but it's the easy and simple way not to screw up. > More helpful if cvs grok'd ChangeLog entries and fixed the log as you > go... but oh well. Should I adjust?
No, I think this is fine. As long as the "vast sweeping changes" are related to each other. If they change completely different things in the code then it makes sense to copy your classpath cvs checkout working directory and work/test these thing separately so they can easily be committed independently from each other. Cheers, Mark _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath