It looks like the mutable locals use case is covered by the "with- local-vars" binding form. That said, I'm not sure how useful this would be. Even in Java 5, 95% of my local vars are immutable, i.e annotated as final and never have any mutating methods called on them. Most of the rest are simple accumulators: StringBuffers, collections which are filled then used then tossed, or summations. In Clojure these would be replaced by some sort of reduction, requiring no . The only time I could see myself using with-local-vars is in some complex graph-theoretic code, of the sort I write maybe once a .
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
