Ah, that makes much more sense. Got it! Sean Corfield -- (970) FOR-SEAN -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ________________________________ From: clojure@googlegroups.com <clojure@googlegroups.com> on behalf of alex <fmno...@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 12:23:50 AM To: Clojure Subject: Re: An Error spec? Sean, thanks for your feedback! Instance of Throwable is fail anyway and I can't imagine a situation when it's not. *exception-base-class* only sets behavior of call - what we should catch and what will be thrown. Probably naming is kinda ambiguous here and *exception-base-class* should be called *catch-from* to make its purpose more clear without reading docstring. пятница, 9 ноября 2018 г., 8:05:18 UTC+2 пользователь Sean Corfield написал: Alex, I’m curious, should this https://github.com/dawcs/flow/blob/master/src/dawcs/flow.clj#L53 use *exception-base-class* rather than Throwable directly? It looks very interesting and elegant – I’ll probably give this a test drive next week! Sean Corfield -- (970) FOR-SEAN -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ________________________________ From: clo...@googlegroups.com<javascript:> <clo...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>> on behalf of alex <fmn...@gmail.com<javascript:>> Sent: Wednesday, November 7, 2018 2:05:28 PM To: Clojure Subject: Re: An Error spec? How about using exception instances as errors? That plays pretty nicely with ex-info and (try ... (catch Exception e e)). I've built https://github.com/dawcs/flow on top of that approach and that seems like pretty good abstraction. Despite I'm not sure about CLJS. Anomalies are also great and you may check out https://github.com/dawcs/anomalies-tools for some tooling around it. But you may still need a bridge to convert exceptions caught from 3rd-party java libs into anomalies structure. And despite Cognitect roots, it doesn't feel like "official standard". пятница, 26 октября 2018 г., 4:46:54 UTC+3 пользователь Didier написал: I've started to see a pattern in my spec like this: (s/or :success string? :error ::error) And I've been tempted to create my own spec macro for this. But I also thought, maybe Spec itself should have such a spec. (s/error <success-spec> <error-spec>) What do people think? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com<javascript:> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com<javascript:> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.