Ah, that makes much more sense. Got it!

Sean Corfield -- (970) FOR-SEAN -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/

"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
-- Margaret Atwood

________________________________
From: clojure@googlegroups.com <clojure@googlegroups.com> on behalf of alex 
<fmno...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 12:23:50 AM
To: Clojure
Subject: Re: An Error spec?

Sean, thanks for your feedback! Instance of Throwable is fail anyway and I 
can't imagine a situation when it's not. *exception-base-class* only sets 
behavior of call  - what we should catch and what will be thrown. Probably 
naming is kinda ambiguous here and *exception-base-class* should be called 
*catch-from* to make its purpose more clear without reading docstring.

пятница, 9 ноября 2018 г., 8:05:18 UTC+2 пользователь Sean Corfield написал:
Alex, I’m curious, should this 
https://github.com/dawcs/flow/blob/master/src/dawcs/flow.clj#L53 use 
*exception-base-class* rather than Throwable directly?

It looks very interesting and elegant – I’ll probably give this a test drive 
next week!

Sean Corfield -- (970) FOR-SEAN -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/

"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
-- Margaret Atwood

________________________________
From: clo...@googlegroups.com<javascript:> 
<clo...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>> on behalf of alex 
<fmn...@gmail.com<javascript:>>
Sent: Wednesday, November 7, 2018 2:05:28 PM
To: Clojure
Subject: Re: An Error spec?

How about using exception instances as errors? That plays pretty nicely with 
ex-info and (try ... (catch Exception e e)). I've built 
https://github.com/dawcs/flow on top of that approach  and that seems like 
pretty good abstraction. Despite I'm not sure about CLJS.
Anomalies are also great and you may check out 
https://github.com/dawcs/anomalies-tools for some tooling around it. But you 
may still need a bridge to convert exceptions caught from 3rd-party java libs 
into anomalies structure. And despite Cognitect roots, it doesn't feel like 
"official standard".

пятница, 26 октября 2018 г., 4:46:54 UTC+3 пользователь Didier написал:
I've started to see a pattern in my spec like this:

(s/or :success string?
      :error ::error)

And I've been tempted to create my own spec macro for this. But I also thought, 
maybe Spec itself should have such a spec.

(s/error <success-spec> <error-spec>)

What do people think?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+u...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to