Cool! Rather then waiting, you could host it in the interim on GitHub or Google Code so people like myself can submit patches (which I'm more than willing to do) ;) Just a thought... A couple of things:
(println (javascript (var x))) I would expect this to convert to: var x; It does not. (println (javascript (new Object {prop1 "a" prop2 "b"}))) > var MyClass = new(ClassGenerator, {prop1:"a",prop2:"b"}); Instead of , var MyClass = new ClassGenerator({prop1:"a", prop2:"b"}); This idiom is essential to MooTools, a JS library I use quite a bit. The other thought that I had was how to use macros with js-gen? The javascript macro pretty much captures everything and doesn't allow macros to be embedded. Seems like this would be quite handy. I've been contemplating writing a system which generates tagged javascript so that it can be sanely debugged if generated server side via Clojure. On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:07 AM, jim <jim.d...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'll be glad to support it if people choose to use it and report > issues. My plans to use are still on my todo list, things just keep > getting put on top of them. One of which is to get my own server set > up to host this and some other projects. > > I'll check out those asserts and make them so they're not dependent on > order. Have you seen anything else that needs to be fixed? > > Thanks > Jim > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---