Laurent PETIT a écrit :
> 2009/4/23 Christophe Grand <christo...@cgrand.net>:
>
>> Laurent PETIT a écrit :
>>
>>> I guess you're right. But a little warning in the javadoc could help
>>> newcomers not shoot themselves in the foot.
>>> And the problem is, calling directly (second) without calling (first)
>>> would work most of the time. I wanted to make it fail every time =>
>>> same behaviour whatever the input data are.
>>>
>>>
>> Such a guarantee implies a side effect on the first seq is realized!
>>
>
> don't understand.
>
Aren't you proposing that:
(let [[x y] (split-with pred coll)]
(seq y))
always throws an exception while
(let [[x y] (split-with pred coll)]
(dorun x)
(seq y))
doesn't?
--
Professional: http://cgrand.net/ (fr)
On Clojure: http://clj-me.blogspot.com/ (en)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
