D'oh! Thanks.

I fall for that trap yet again. Sounds so simple when explained.

2010/2/9 Sean Devlin <francoisdev...@gmail.com>:
> The problem is that map returns a lazy seq, and the lazy seq is
> evaluated outside of the binding by the REPL.  If you add a doall
> inside the binding, it behaves as you expect.
>
> user=> (binding [*v* 2] (doall (map f [1 1 1])))
> (3 3 3)
>
> Sean

I know I've omitted this detail, but the actual code in question is
actually *db* binding from clojure.contrib.sql, so I can't change it
either way. doall works fine though.

2010/2/9 Richard Newman <holyg...@gmail.com>:
> You can also capture the binding. This looks a little ugly, but it works: it
> grabs the binding eagerly, and returns a closure that dynamically binds it
> when the function is invoked.
>
> (binding [*v* 2]
>  (map (let [v *v*]
>         (fn [n]
>           (binding [*v* v]
>             (f n))))
>       [1 1 1]))
>
> Obviously you wouldn't use it in this instance -- use doall, or better yet
> rewrite your function to not use dynamic bindings -- but for larger jobs it
> works fine.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to