On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 9:30 PM, David Cabana <drcab...@gmail.com> wrote:
> conj is not the same as append; it will insert the new element in the > smart (most efficient) way. For instance: > user> (conj '(1 2 3) 0) > (0 1 2 3) > user> (conj [1 2 3] 0) > [1 2 3 0] > > There is no performance hit from using conj to insert at the end of a vector. Interesting to know. Just curious which one is more efficient(not that I question the vector append is slow) as it would still involve some array copy and creation(though I assume it would be very efficient as it is using the very low level i.e. sort of memcpy) whereas the single-link-list cons would always be O(1). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
