On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 08:58, Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 17 September 2010 00:56, Michael Ossareh <ossa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Meikel,
>>
>>>
>>>>     (recur (cond (not (nil? (data key)))
>>>>                (true? true)
>>>
>>> *ieeck* Please do (cond ... :else default-clause). Not true, or (true?
>>> true) or other stuff.
>>
>> Wow, I somehow missed the :else option in cond? I've got that (true?
>> true) stuff scattered all over my code - going to change that right
>> now. Thanks for showing me this.
>
> It's not actually an ":else option in cond".  Anything that is not
> false or nil can work there, so :any-arb-keyword would work just as
> well as :else.  But by convention, Clojure programmers tend to use
> :else.
>

Thanks for confirming my thoughts, Michael. Indeed I immediately
checked the docs and couldn't find :else referenced.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to