David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Steve Purcell <st...@sanityinc.com> > wrote: > > Well, taking a brief look over your code, it seems like the main > difference is that scriptjure is macro-based, so all the code > generation > gets done at compile-time. > > > js-gen generates js at compile time.
Indeed - my embarrassing mistake, for which I apologise! A more thorough reading of the code would have shown up the one key macro that ties it all together. > That makes scriptjure faster, but at the expense of needing an > unquote > form - "(clj ...)" - to splice clojure expressions into the > javascript source > sexps. > > > I haven't found this to be true at all. Scriptjure in my tests is > quite a bit slower because it doesn't emit the final generated code at > compile time, but an intermediate form that permits splicing. > I look forward to the cross-pollinations of ideas between these two > endeavors :) Indeed. Thanks for taking the time to correct me! Now time for me to actually play with js-gen in earnest... -Steve -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
