> I think the big problem, is that Clojure makes a big deal about being > "Simple". That is, avoiding unneeded complexity, but then throws its > users into the sea of complexity that is Java. >
The choice to build on Java definitely takes us away from simplicity, but we gain a lot of power and reach because of it. Like any design choice, it was a compromise. Stuart Halloway talked about this in his "Simplicity Ain't Easy" talk. http://blip.tv/clojure/stuart-halloway-simplicity-ain-t-easy-4842694 -Stuart Sierra clojure.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
