Alexander Semenov <bohtva...@gmail.com> writes: > The second lazy approach still needs to traverse all the sequence > recursively, why doesn't it cause stack overflow?
You might find my answer to the StackOverflow question "Thinking in Lazy Sequences" useful here: http://stackoverflow.com/a/2214049/31818 Note that I wrote it about a year and a half ago. I hope the references to the Java classes are still correct. -- Steven E. Harris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
