Thanks, this is perfectly reasonable! On Wednesday, April 22, 2015 at 4:35:17 PM UTC+3, Stuart Sierra wrote: > > core.async is still technically alpha, so everything is potentially > subject to change. Rich H. wrote[1] most of those core.async functions, and > he tends to treat the docstring as the only contract for future releases. > > If you want to be safe, make a unit test in your app that specifically > tests any undocumented properties of public functions, so you can see if > and when they change. > > [1]: > https://github.com/clojure/core.async/blame/d8047c0b0ec13788c1092f579f03733ee635c493/src/main/clojure/clojure/core/async.clj#L455 > > –S > > > > On Wednesday, April 22, 2015 at 11:26:11 AM UTC+1, Stanislav Yurin wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> There are functions like 'pipe' and 'tap' that are returning back >> receiving channel parameter, >> but this behavior is not explicitly documented. >> >> Should we rely on this feature or this may be changed in future? >> >> Thanks. >> >> Stanislav. >> >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
