> 350ms sounds fast enough for a low-frequency user interaction. In fact, once > login is fast enough not to annoy your users, you don't *want* any more > speed from it, as further speedup then only benefits blackhats trying to > brute-force one of your users' accounts. So, it might be a feature, not a > bug.
Those seem like really weird statements to me. :-) a) I thought it was 250 msec as the upper abound for things feeling snappy. Tho others apparently say 100 msec or less. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/536300/what-is-the-shortest-perceivable-application-response-delay b) If anybody is relying on 350 msec vs. e.g. 100 msec as some grand solution to black hats brute forcing logins, I strongly suspect they are doing it very wrong. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
