Hi Chip, On 06-Sep-2012, at 12:55 AM, Chip Childers <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Rohit Yadav <[email protected]> wrote: >> Do we need to fix/add Apache license for: >> - text files (README, INSTALL, NOTICE etc.) >> - configuration files >> - awsapi (top level LICENSE suggest they're BSD 3-clause) >> - deps >> - docs >> - patches/ >> - plugins >> - apidocs/ >> - tools >> - ui What about these files/dirs? They don't have Apache or any other license. As we already removed most dependencies from the source tree, do we need to remove non-jars deps like jquery as well? > This is very cool, but doesn't RAT do most of this for us? > > I know that we had some issues with the initial reports not providing > an accurate indication of the stray Citrix license headers, but I > think that is resolved now. I would suggest that another manual QA of > the files would be helpful. Okay I'll check them manually this weekend but I trust grep/sed :) > Once we are at a stable state (with the appropriate exclude properties > set the RAT Maven plugin config at the top level pom.xml), we would > have an automatic solution tied into Maven for auditing compliance. > > Does that work? As soon as we fix the build system issues, I'll give RAT a try, probably research on maven and maven plugins this weekend. Regards, Rohit > > -chip
