On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Joe Brockmeier <j...@zonker.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 01:48:14PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote: > > Edits highlighted. > > Would you mind not preceding clean text with > ? It looks like quoted > text when I'm reading it in email. Thanks. Not sure what you mean. Do you mean "please don't edit and quote at the same time"? > > > In addition to the official source code release, the project has also > > > made convenience binaries available on the Apache CloudStack download > > > page. > > > > > > > Above para is not needed. > > I disagree, strongly. > > We supply the convenience binaries for a reason. That's because quite a > few users won't want to compile from source - we should make sure it's > obvious that we do supply binaries, even though source is the official > release. > Why specify? If you link through to the downloads page, without mentioning source or binary, then people are just going to assume there is something there for them. That is, I am operating under the assumption people either a) don't care, or b) assume binary packages. Your call though. Just a suggestion. > > I would actually move this to the top of the email. It is our call to > > action. Why burry it? > > We haven't yet established for most users 1) what CloudStack is or 2) > why they should care about 4.0.0-incubating. Okay. > > Announcements are for users as much as they are for PR/AR. > > Yes, and they're as much for users who don't know what CloudStack is or > why they should download it just because they've crossed paths with an > announcement that says it's out. > K. -- NS
