Hi John,

Wish to revisit this topic - 

Any reason you didn't take this approach indicated on this thread? 
http://markmail.org/message/ccsurkqhvxunqe26

Also, are any of the requirements listed here 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/S3-based+secondary+Storage
 addressed in your implementation?

Thanks!

Hari Kannan

-----Original Message-----
From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 3:51 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: S3 Based secondary storage - Stories 509 and 714

Marcus,

The integration uses the S3 client.  Therefore, any storage service that 
supports the S3 API can be used by specifying a different end point in the 
CloudStack configuration.  To that point, I test against both Amazon S3 and 
Riak CS.

Thanks,
-John

On Jan 16, 2013, at 2:19 AM, Marcus Sorensen <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Just for clarification, this feature isn't tied to amazon's S3, right? 
> Any
> S3 compatible gateway would do?
> On Jan 15, 2013 5:52 PM, "John Burwell" <jburw...@basho.com> wrote:
>
>> Sudha,
>>
>> The issue with adding Marvin tests for S3 is the requirement and 
>> associated costs for an S3 account.  For obvious reasons, I can not 
>> put my account credentials into a test case checked into a public 
>> repo used many people.  Also, the indeterminate nature of 
>> synchronization process (i.e. polling every sixty seconds and the 
>> bandwidth available to S3 for download/upload operations) makes it 
>> very difficult to programmatically verify.  Therefore, S3 is only 
>> testable manually at this time.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -John
>>
>> On Jan 15, 2013, at 6:40 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti 
>> <sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Nitin/John,
>>>
>>> There are two stories listed in JIRA - CLOUDSTACK 509 and CLOUDSTACK
>> 714. Looks like 714 is duplicate of 509.
>>> Can I mark 714 as  duplicate of 509??
>>>
>>> Also need response from John B/Prasanna, if any tests are added to
>> Marvin. If so have they been run??
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> /Sudha
>>

Reply via email to