I need to read HV version as part of CLOUDSTACK-672. It not just for 
consistency, the HV version was not getting updated in the correct place.

From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of Nitin Mehta
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 5:21 PM
To: Alex Huang; Nitin Mehta
Cc: cloudstack; Koushik Das
Subject: Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-988: HV version must be updated in 
hypervisor_version column of host table

This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: 
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8993/




Is this just for the sake of consistency ? Was something affected because of 
this ? If yes, we need to take care of migration as well.


- Nitin


On January 17th, 2013, 12:46 p.m., Koushik Das wrote:
Review request for cloudstack, Nitin Mehta and Alex Huang.
By Koushik Das.

Updated Jan. 17, 2013, 12:46 p.m.

Description

HV version is stored in 'hypervisor_version' column in host table wherever 
present.

Also correctly populating 'version' column in host table with resource file 
version.


Testing

Verified that HV version is correctly updated in host table for XS and Vmware

Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-988
Diffs

 *   core/src/com/cloud/network/resource/TrafficSentinelResource.java (a13e080)
 *   
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java
 (a444cfe)
 *   
plugins/network-elements/f5/src/com/cloud/network/resource/F5BigIpResource.java 
(c9c3711)
 *   
plugins/network-elements/juniper-srx/src/com/cloud/network/resource/JuniperSrxResource.java
 (f823ab8)
 *   
plugins/network-elements/netscaler/src/com/cloud/network/resource/NetscalerResource.java
 (afb0135)
 *   
plugins/network-elements/nicira-nvp/src/com/cloud/network/resource/NiciraNvpResource.java
 (12ed72a)
 *   server/src/com/cloud/baremetal/ExternalDhcpResourceBase.java (cbfcfd1)
 *   server/src/com/cloud/baremetal/PxeServerResourceBase.java (c307ccf)
 *   server/src/com/cloud/resource/DummyHostServerResource.java (5144a91)
 *   server/src/com/cloud/resource/ResourceManagerImpl.java (ffc09f0)

View Diff<https://reviews.apache.org/r/8993/diff/>


Reply via email to