On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
<animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote:
> This came in as I was following up on  action item from IRC today. This 
> feature is something that has already been developed before ACS 4.0 and 
> processes were formalized and also had been demonstrated in public forms such 
> as in Intel Developers Forum last Sept but somehow missed getting filed. Can 
> we consider it as an exception and take it for 4.1.  I understand we are few 
> days past cutoff,  I will ensure we are more diligent in future.
>
> Animesh

Just to close the loop on this.  I'm not sure that this is even
progressing enough to make it in by out feature freeze date (if it is,
it's not visible to the rest of the community).  Is the request to
include it in 4.1.0 a moot point?

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 11:46 AM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Cc: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Support for Intel TXT technology
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Hari Kannan <hari.kan...@citrix.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello All,
>> >
>> > I wish to propose Support for Intel TXT for Cloud Use cases - I have
>> > added some details here
>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Support+for+Int
>> > el+TXT+Technology
>> >
>> > along with a JIRA ticket
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-939
>> >
>> > Please review and comment
>> >
>> > Hari Kannan
>>
>> I've commented on the ticket. This has come in after our agreed proposal
>> deadline, so I've changed the targeted version to Future.
>>
>> --David
>

Reply via email to