I just happened to build his latest asf/master code and encountered an issue with the listegressfirewallrules API . The UI passes the network ID to this API where the network ID is actually the network UUID but the API throws the error that it's not able to recognize the network id . While executing the API through REST client , by changing the network id to integer ID after I checked the corresponding integer ID for the network's UUID from the db , the API call gave a successful response.
There seems to be some issue with the listegressfirewallRules API logic . Can somebody confirm this behavior ? @Jayapal - can you please check the API logic ? Thanks, Pranav -----Original Message----- From: Pranav Saxena [mailto:pranav.sax...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 8:48 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Abhinandan Prateek Cc: Jayapal Reddy Uradi Subject: RE: [RESULT] [IP Clearance] Citrix donation of egress firewall manipulation for guest network to Apache CloudStack After the IP clearance result, the patch for the backend code for this feature was merged with asf/master and hence I have enabled this feature on the Cloudstack UI as well . Thanks, Pranav -----Original Message----- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 9:49 AM To: Abhinandan Prateek; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Jayapal Reddy Uradi Subject: RE: [RESULT] [IP Clearance] Citrix donation of egress firewall manipulation for guest network to Apache CloudStack Yes, Abhi I noticed that later when I was reviewing all patches in reviewboard Animesh > -----Original Message----- > From: Abhinandan Prateek > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 7:53 PM > To: Animesh Chaturvedi; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: Jayapal Reddy Uradi > Subject: Re: [RESULT] [IP Clearance] Citrix donation of egress > firewall manipulation for guest network to Apache CloudStack > > Yes, we tried to commit the patch yesterday, but there were several > conflicts. We will merge the patch that has removed the conflicts today. > > -abhi > > On 30/01/13 11:24 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" > <animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> > wrote: > > >Jayapal, Abhi > > > >Can you get this in ASAP since IP Clearance is complete. It's up on > >review board https://reviews.apache.org/r/9010/ > > > >Animesh > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > >Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 2:04 PM > >To: gene...@incubator.apache.org > >Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > >Subject: [RESULT] [IP Clearance] Citrix donation of egress firewall > >manipulation for guest network to Apache CloudStack > > > >Our 72 hour window has passed. So, I'm calling this IP CLEARANCE complete. > > > >--David > > > >On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:43 AM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > >> Citrix has offered donation of egress firewall manipulation for > >> guest networks to Apache CloudStack. > >> > >> - The code was uploaded to ReviewBoard by the author (Jayapal > >> Reddy) [1] > >> - The ASF secretary has received an ICLA from Jayapal. > >> - The IP clearance form has been submitted to the incubator site[2] > >> - The CloudStack vote to accept the contribution passed [3] > >> > >> If there are any concerns, please don't hesitate to raise them. > >> > >> --David > >> > >> [1] https://reviews.apache.org/r/9010/ > >> [2] > >> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cloudstack-egress-firewall > >> -r > >> u > >> les.html [3] > >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack- > dev/201 > >> 3 > >> > 01.mbox/%3c7A92FF96DF135843B4B608FB576BFC3E012DA3ADF543@SJCPM > AILBOX01. > >> citrite.net%3e
