On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 10:00:26AM -0800, Sheng Yang wrote: > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com> > wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 03:21:38PM +0530, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote: > >> Hi Sheng, Chip and other community members, > >> > >> What have we decided about the IPv6 support in 4.1 ? > > > > Looks like it isn't decided. Do you have an opinion? > > > > Do others? > > > > Sheng - can you try to bring this to a consensus? > > In fact I am trying to bring this to a consensus using this thread... > > I think we're OK with API only.
Ahmad is suggesting otherwise, but I'm in agreement with you. Our next feature release is probably the right time to bring it into the UI. Ahmad - any reasoning you can share around why you suggest having it in the UI? > > --Sheng > > > >> > >> API only, or both UI and APIs ? I am in the process of documenting this > >> feature. > >> > >> > >> Thank You > >> -Radhika > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com] > >> Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 3:43 AM > >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: Reverting UI for IPv6 in 4.1 > >> > >> UI + docs on how to use the feature via api and its caveats (system > >> template X). > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: > >> > >> > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Chip Childers > >> > <chip.child...@sungard.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 01:50:20PM -0800, Sheng Yang wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> > >> > >> Since we didn't plan to include ipv6 template as default for 4.1 > >> > >> release, is it necessary to revert the UI part of IPv6 to avoid > >> > >> confusion in 4.1? We can support API only for 4.1 > >> > >> > >> > >> --Sheng > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > So we talked about it being experimental. Do you think we should > >> > > make experimental = API-based configuration only? I tend to lean > >> > > that way > >> > myself. > >> > > >> > I am OK with it, just want to hear more people's idea on it. > >> > > >> > If it's only API-based, it would be more difficult for potential user > >> > to try it. But left UI there without default system vm template > >> > support would be misleading. > >> > > >> > --Sheng > >> > > >> >
