If ebtables -F restores vm service(s)... it sounds like a bug.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Marcus Sorensen <shadow...@gmail.com>wrote: > Quick question, I deployed a basic zone today on 4.1 for testing, and > I chose the default network provider WITHOUT security groups. The > result was that all of the instances deployed could not host services. > They could get out, but nothing could reach their IPs. I ran an > 'ebtables -t nat -L' and saw that there were rules set up for each > instance, but there were no security group settings available to > adjust. Is this a bug, or was I doing something wrong? >
