-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9752/#review18073
-----------------------------------------------------------



test/integration/component/test_snapshots_improvements.py
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/9752/#comment38161>

    Make sure you aren't leaving any unused service dictionaries.



test/integration/component/test_snapshots_improvements.py
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/9752/#comment38160>

    The url appears to be local. Also - the windows template  test will not be 
checked by cloudstack. So this can be any vhd. Use the default builtin CentOS 
vhd for this test?



test/integration/component/test_snapshots_improvements.py
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/9752/#comment38162>

    can you fix the trailing spaces in this patch?
    
    git apply --whitespace=fix your.patch should take care of this.



test/integration/component/test_snapshots_improvements.py
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/9752/#comment38164>

    Can you put a FIXME: JIRA issue CLOUDSTACK-601?



test/integration/component/test_snapshots_improvements.py
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/9752/#comment38165>

    The test runner code (__main__) can be gotten rid of. It's not required 
when the test runs on test infra.


- Prasanna Santhanam


On March 19, 2013, 12:45 p.m., sanjeev n wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/9752/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 19, 2013, 12:45 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added two test cases for snapshots improvement feature.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   test/integration/component/test_snapshots_improvements.py PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9752/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Executed the tests in advanced zone setup.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> sanjeev n
> 
>

Reply via email to