On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 15:15:58 -0500, Taylor Braun-Jones wrote:
> That's too bad. I understand the perspective of the Ninja developers,
> but it's not clear to me what the proposed alternative should be.
> Should CMake be using the subninja[1] keyword to include the
> build.ninja of External Projects?
That would be possible with the work that's been done here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.programming.tools.cmake.devel/15364
--Ben
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more
information on each offering, please visit:
CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
