On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:21 AM, Tobias Hunger <tobias.hun...@qt.io> wrote: > On Do, 2016-06-30 at 14:16 -0400, Robert Maynard wrote: >> It might be worthwhile to have the version section to have an explicit >> dirty key instead of having to parse the string key to find that >> information out. > > I'll make that information available in a separate patch and add it.
Thanks! > >> Also wouldn't you want server-mode to be an empty dictionary, as in >> the future that would contain information like the wire format >> version, etc. > > Getting the information here would be expensive (I would need to instanciate a > cmServer to get the information) and I do not really see too big a need to add > that information in the first place. Long-term I will just require a cmake > with > server-mode and "serverMode": "false" is enough to tell the user that she > needs > to update her cmake:-) > > The decision of which protocol to choose to talk to the server will be made > later, in a different part of the code. > That is a very reasonable. > Best Regards, > Tobias > > -- > Tobias Hunger, Senior Software Engineer | The Qt Company > The Qt Company GmbH, Rudower Chaussee 13, D-12489 Berlin > Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius, Mika Harjuaho. Sitz der > Gesellschaft: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 144331 > B -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
