Eric Noulard escreveu: > Could you explain a little more > 0) Which version of CMake do you use? cmake-cvs as of 2008/01/16
> 1) How did you invoke CMake with distcc? > > Is it something like: > CC="distcc gcc" CXX="distcc g++" cmake > or something different? usually there's a directory /usr/lib/distcc/bin with symlinks to /usr/bin/distcc, for instance: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/lib/distcc/bin $ ls -l total 0 (...) c++ -> /usr/bin/distcc (...) cc -> /usr/bin/distcc (...) g++ -> /usr/bin/distcc (...) gcc -> /usr/bin/distcc (...) i686-pc-linux-gnu-c++ -> /usr/bin/distcc (...) i686-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -> /usr/bin/distcc (...) i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -> /usr/bin/distcc One should add /usr/lib/distcc/bin as the first path in PATH environment variable, and it's all done. distcc knows which compiler to call in each machine looking at argv[0]. After this setup, make -jX would do the trick, distcc would try to balance the compiler tasks to the computers at hand. > 2) What you are trying to do? > Shouldn't all boxes used by distcc share their architecture? > I mean can you use distcc with 2 boxes one being i686 and > the other one being amd64? > How should this work? No, you can even use a Windows box, as long as there is a cross-compiler to the target architecture in it. For instance, in each computer here there's a i686-pc-linux-gcc, even if it's an amd64 box. By using the complete compiler name, distcc will only call i686-pc-linux-gcc in every box. > Do you mean you CANNOT use "gcc" but a gcc cross compiler > named like "i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc", if yes then may be you can try > invoking CMake like this: > > CC="distcc i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc" cmake Well, if the above setup is made, one might call: CC="i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc" cmake . and it'll work, but this is suboptimal IMHO. I can't see any other bad side effect of using the complete compiler name instead of the short one. Regards, rod _______________________________________________ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
