On 2011-09-20 16:21-0400 David Cole wrote:

I will be reverting the commits associated with the bad bug fix
mentioned here, so that we will end up with "equivalent to 2.8.5"
behavior with respect to this.

We'll have to shoot for a real fix for next time.

Thanks, Dave, for that good decision.

BTW, I normally don't test the optimised case like I just did for
2.8.6-rc3.  Therefore as due diligence, I repeated that exact
optimized test for 2.8.5, and all was well. So "equivalent to 2.8.5"
should work here, but I will check once you get out the next RC just
to be absolutely sure that 2.8.6 will be fine for PLplot.

Alan
__________________________
Alan W. Irwin

Astronomical research affiliation with Department of Physics and Astronomy,
University of Victoria (astrowww.phys.uvic.ca).

Programming affiliations with the FreeEOS equation-of-state
implementation for stellar interiors (freeeos.sf.net); the Time
Ephemerides project (timeephem.sf.net); PLplot scientific plotting
software package (plplot.sf.net); the libLASi project
(unifont.org/lasi); the Loads of Linux Links project (loll.sf.net);
and the Linux Brochure Project (lbproject.sf.net).
__________________________

Linux-powered Science
__________________________
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Reply via email to