On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Bill Hoffman <bill.hoff...@kitware.com> wrote:
> What version of Visual studio? And, do you have a small reproducible test > case for this? Oops - missed replying to the list. Visual Studio 2010. I can try to create a small test case, but in the mean time we can avoid the issue by setting CMAKE_SUPPRESS_REGENERATION to ON for Visual Studio generators only. As long as Visual Studio can't cleanly handle re-loading everything quietly after a CMake re-run, there's no point in allowing regeneration from Visual Studio at all. Perhaps an alternative would be to print a warning that the CMakeCache.txt file looks newer than the generated build system - is there anything in CMake that can provide that capability? Thanks, Cliff -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
